Home News Developer Explains Why Some Bad Steam Reviews Might Be Coming From Scammers

Developer Explains Why Some Bad Steam Reviews Might Be Coming From Scammers

Developer Explains Why Some Bad Steam Reviews Might Be Coming From Scammers

A cartoon alligator in a purple hat makes a weird face in front of some Steam reviews.

Steam is each an easy-to-use digital sport storefront and a rabbit gap of shady shit, stuffed with bizarre, archaic leftovers from previous concepts Valve by no means received round to ending or bettering. One such instance is the curator system. Most customers barely work together with it, however lately an indie developer believes the system is being utilized by scammers who additionally promote sport codes on grey markets. They declare that as a result of they didn’t present free codes their newest sport was focused by these supposed grifters on Steam.

Yesterday on Twitter, Cowcat, the developer behind Brok—a newly launched point-and-click beat ‘em up starring an alligator—shared a now-viral thread explaining how a selected kind of rip-off involving curators, Steam codes, and evaluations works. Steam curator lists are user-made and anybody can create and replace them with evaluations for brand new or outdated video games, serving to individuals simply discover the subsequent sport to buy. And whereas technically nothing within the thread is confirmed by the supposed scammers themselves, the proof is telling and is one other instance of the sorts of shit smaller sport devs must cope with when making an attempt to make and promote video games within the yr 2022. Although, scammers tricking devs and PR into giving up codes isn’t a brand new phenomenon by any means.

On August 28, simply two days after Brok’s launch date, Cowcat defined that the sport was being focused by some Steam curators with suspicious damaging evaluations. Whereas many of those curators had a whole bunch of constructive evaluations for varied different video games, some had launched damaging curator evaluations for Brok.

What makes this extra suspicious is that many of those curators solely had one damaging overview and it was their Brok overview. Cowcat claims that many of those curators had initially posted constructive evaluations for Brok. However then one thing modified. So, what occurred? Nicely, the dev believes that this try to filter out scammers by emailing them free codes had angered some individuals.

Normally, indie dev e-mail inboxes are flooded with individuals requesting codes, claiming to be reviewers, critics, YouTubers, publishers, and so forth. As Cowcat mentions within the thread, most of those are scammers seeking to get some free codes that may then be offered on shady key-selling websites. However in an effort to not by accident ignore the few legit critics and reviewers reaching out to play Brok, Cowcat got here up with a plan. They despatched all these individuals Steam keys for the free-to-play Brok prologue, which acts as a prequel and demo to the complete sport. Cowcat figured individuals who actually wished to play the sport for overview functions would use the code, see it was for the free prologue and attain out in regards to the mistake. And whereas some did certainly contact the dev in regards to the “mistake” most didn’t, which Cowcat believes is as a result of they didn’t need to play it, they as an alternative shortly offered the important thing by way of shady key sellers.


This transfer doubtless precipitated these scammers some bother as individuals who purchased the keys found that they had been screwed. So Cowcat believes that a few of these con artists turned to their curator pages on Steam and reviewed Brok negatively earlier than its launch. What makes these evaluations very suspect is that Cowcat by no means gave out the complete sport to those individuals, but their evaluations declare to have performed the complete sport.

It ought to be famous that any curator can overview any sport on Steam, even when they don’t personal it or have by no means performed it, making it even simpler for individuals to make use of the outdated, barely up to date system for fraud.

Kotaku has reached out to Cowcat and Valve.

In spite of everything this, Cowcat says they plan on reporting these Steam curators to Valve. Additionally they additional criticized the corporate for persevering with to permit shady Steam curators and rip-off artists to make use of constructive and damaging evaluations like this to “blackmail” indie devs. Additional, they requested individuals to not purchase video games by way of shady key websites because the devs don’t see a dime from these gross sales because the codes are sometimes gained by way of scams just like the one Cowcat believes these curators are concerned in.

As for the way this can have an effect on Brok, Cowcat isn’t frightened as they don’t imagine these curators result in many gross sales on Steam. However they’re nonetheless glad their thread went viral and helps unfold the phrase on how these kinds of scams proceed to go unpunished on Steam.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here