Intel has posted the newest Arc A750 graphics card gaming benchmarks throughout a wide array of titles working DX12 and Vulkan API. The corporate proceeded to check their mainstream card in opposition to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 at FHD & QHD and came upon that their chip delivers higher efficiency.
Intel Arc A750 Graphics Card Is Up To 5% Faster Than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Across 48 DX12 & Vulkan Titles
We’ve got seen the Intel Arc A750 Restricted Version graphics card being examined throughout numerous titles beforehand and we additionally noticed a collection of 1st-tier video games the place the Arc A750 is claimed to supply as much as 17% higher efficiency versus its opponents. Now, we aren’t simply taking a look at 1st-tier titles however efficiency by a collection of 48 totally different DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles and 1080p & 1440p.
Intel Arc A750 Graphics Card Specs
The Intel Arc A750 Restricted Version graphics card contains a cut-down ACM-G10 “Alchemist” GPU with 448 EUs, 3584 ALUs, and 12 GB of GDDR6 reminiscence working throughout a 192-bit bus at 16 Gbps, and a TGP round 200W.
The graphics card is powered by an 8+6 connector configuration which suggests a most board energy of 300W (150W+75W from connectors & 75W energy from the PCIe interface). The highest Intel Arc A770 and Arc A750 graphics playing cards will are available Restricted Version flavors alongside customized designs from companions. The cardboard options three DisplayPort 2.0 and a single HDMI 2.1 connector.
Intel Arc A-Sequence Desktop Graphics Card Lineup ‘Rumored’:
| Graphics Card Variant | GPU Variant | GPU Die | Execution Models | Shading Models (Cores) | Reminiscence Capability | Reminiscence Pace | Reminiscence Bus | TGP | Worth | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arc A770 | Xe-HPG 512EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 512 EUs (TBD) | 4096 (TBD) | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 256-bit | 225W | $349-$399 US | Formally Introduced |
| Arc A770 | Xe-HPG 512EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 512 EUs (TBD) | 4096 (TBD) | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 256-bit | 225W | $349-$399 US | Confirmed By means of Leak |
| Arc A750 | Xe-HP3G 448EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 448 EUs (TBD) | 3584 (TBD) | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 256-bit | 225W | $299-$349 US | Formally Introduced |
| Arc A580 | Xe-HPG 256EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 256 EUs (TBD) | 2048 (TBD) | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 128-bit | 175W | $200-$299 US | Confirmed By means of Leak |
| Arc A380 | Xe-HPG 128EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G11 | 128 EUs | 1024 | 6 GB GDDR6 | 15.5 Gbps | 96-bit | 75W | $129-$139 US | Formally Launched |
| Arc A310 | Xe-HPG 64 (TBD) | Arc ACM-G11 | 64 EUs (TBD) | 512 (TBD) | 4 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 64-bit | 75W | $59-$99 US | Confirmed By means of Leak |
Intel Arc A750 Graphics Card Efficiency
Efficiency was examined utilizing the identical programs working an Intel Core i9-12900K CPU, a high-end Z690 motherboard and 32 GB (16 GB x2) DDR5 reminiscence working at as much as 5600 Mbps speeds. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 was working the GeForce 516.59 drivers whereas the Arc A750 was utilizing a engineering driver.
As for efficiency, the cardboard trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 in numerous titles. At 1080p, the Intel Arc A750 graphics card is a mean of 4% quicker in DX12 and three% quicker in Vulkan versus the competitors. At 1440p, the distinction widens by a bit with the Arc A750 delivering as much as 5% higher efficiency in each Vulkan and DX12 titles. Because of this at greater resolutions, the Intel Arc graphics card can have a slight benefit over the competitors regardless of each playing cards having the identical 12 GB reminiscence buffer.
Following is the complete efficiency breakdown:
Merchandise talked about on this submit