Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs iPhone 13

After 2021’s Galaxy Z Flip 3 broke foldables out into the mainstream, Samsung is anticipating huge issues of the Galaxy Z Flip 4. However is it able to sort out the general smartphone champ, the iPhone 13?

Apple’s hottest cellphone is the proper barometer by which to guage whether or not the Galaxy Z Flip 4 among the many greatest telephones, or stays reserved to the collective of greatest foldables.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs iPhone 13 worth and availability

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 hands on blue open and closed

(Picture credit score: Future)

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 is on sale from August 26 within the US and UK, and September 2 in Australia. Pricing begins from $999.99 / £999 / AU$1,499 for 128GB, shifting as much as $1,059.99 / £1,059 / AU$1,649 for 256GB. This 12 months, there’s additionally a 512GB mannequin, which prices $1,179.99 / £1,199 / AU$1,849.

Then we have now the iPhone 13, which arrived in outlets on September 24, 2021. Costs begin from $799 / £799 / AU$1,349 for the bottom 128GB mannequin, shifting as much as $899 / £879 / AU$1,519 for 256GB construct and $1,099 / £1,079 / AU$1,869 for 512GB variant.

It’s not usually that Apple telephones appear like a cut price, however the iPhone 13 is considerably cheaper than its collapsible counterpart.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs iPhone 13 design 

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 review Bora Purple V angled

(Picture credit score: Future)

Each of those telephones look lots like their rapid predecessors. That’s no unhealthy factor, nonetheless, while you’re coping with two iconic designs.

The Galaxy Z Fold 4 is a clamshell flip cellphone that unfurls right into a full-sized handset. Its flat sides faintly remind us of the iPhone 13, however Samsung’s distinctive two-tone rear end units it aside. This features a daring vary of colours set off by a black ‘visor’ impact protecting the digicam module.

Apple’s iPhone 13 wants no introduction, with a deal with sharp, fully flat surfaces that has reconfigured the complete smartphone business. Like we already stated, even Samsung isn’t resistant to the affect.

iPhone 13

(Picture credit score: TechRadar)

At 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9mm when unfurled, the Galaxy Z Flip 4 is taller and slimmer than the 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.65mm iPhone 13, but additionally fractionally wider. At 187g vs 174g, Samsung’s foldable is just a little heavier too.

Samsung covers its cellphone with Gorilla Glass Victus Plus, whereas the iPhone 13 makes use of a customized Ceramic Protect that mixes nano-ceramic crystals into the glass. It’s supposedly more durable than any normal show glass.

Apple additionally wins factors for its IP68 certification, which implies that it’s equally waterproof however far more dust-resistant than the IPX8 licensed Galaxy Z Flip 4.

Apple and Samsung take very completely different approaches to biometric authentication. The iPhone 13 has Apple’s superior Face ID system, whereas the Galaxy Z Flip 4 used a relatively old school side-mounted fingerprint system.

Each are tried and examined options, and the ‘winner’ partly comes to non-public choice. Apple’s Face ID system – whereas being 20% smaller than earlier than – is much extra intrusive than Samsung’s refined gap punch notch.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs iPhone 13 show 

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 hands on beige V angled

(Picture credit score: Future)

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 could be a tiny sq. of a factor in its closed place, nevertheless it folds out right into a full-sized cellphone. Certainly, its 6.7-inch show is extra comparable in dimension to the iPhone 13 Professional Max‘s display than to the iPhone 13’s 6.1-inch instance.

Each are AMOLEDs, so that they’re equally vibrant and color-accurate. Nonetheless, the iPhone 13’s display is just a little sharper, with a decision of 2532 x 1170 to the Samsung’s 2640 x 1080. Given the distinction in dimension, that interprets to a 460ppi density for the iPhone, and 426ppi for the Flip 4.

iPhone 13

(Picture credit score: TechRadar)

That’s a reasonably refined distinction while you come right down to it. Extra consequential is the matter of display refresh fee, with the Galaxy Z Flip 4’s 120Hz straight up doubling the iPhone 13’s 60Hz. Which means the Flip 4’s primary display scrolls content material twice as easily because the iPhone’s, benefiting every little thing from net content material to sure fast-action video games.

The Galaxy Z Flip 4 has one other ace up its sleeve within the type of a second show that sits on the surface of the cellphone, although it’s of considerably restricted use. This tiny 1.9-inch Cowl Show packs a 260 x 512 decision and a 60Hz refresh fee, and is principally helpful for heads-up notifications whereas the cellphone is closed (an issue the iPhone 13 doesn’t want to unravel) and as a viewfinder for superior selfie pictures.

We known as the Cowl Show the Galaxy Z Flip 3’s “least spectacular characteristic” however the expertise on the Flip 4 has been larger expanded upon, making its inclusion extra worthwhile.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs iPhone 13 digicam 

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 review Bora Purple cover display

(Picture credit score: Future)

Each telephones use a duo of 12MP cameras – one for normal extensive pictures, one other for ultra-wide pictures.

In each instances, the producer has elevated the primary sensor dimension from the earlier fashions. For the Galaxy Z Flip 4, meaning a 65% brightness increase over the Flip 3, whereas the iPhone 13 sensor pulls in 47% extra gentle than the iPhone 12.

In relation to one another, the Flip 4 primary sensor seems to be barely greater, with 1.8µm pixels to the iPhone 13’s 1.7µm. Samsung’s system additionally advantages from improved OIS (optical picture stabilization) and VDIS (video digital picture stabilization) abilities in comparison with earlier than.

Very similar to the cellphone’s biometric safety, whereas there are clear variations, your most well-liked snapper will doubtless fall to non-public choice, relatively than empirical superiority.

(*13*)iPhone 13

(Picture credit score: TechRadar)

The iPhone 13 takes phenomenal photographs in a variety of lighting situations, probably aided by its superior sensor shift stabilization system, which was taken instantly from the earlier 12 months’s expensive iPhone 12 Professional Max. Our reviewer known as capturing with it “an incredible point-and-shoot expertise”.

As for the Flip 4, it lacks the extensive dynamic vary of the iPhone however makes up for it with higher element, higher low gentle seize and extra artistic capturing modes, particularly while you issue FlexCam mode, which capitalizes on cellphone’s folding type issue.

On the selfie entrance, Apple provides you one other 12MP sensor, whereas the Galaxy Z Flip 4 goes with a 10MP sensor.

For all of the {hardware} speak, software program is king with smartphone digicam programs. Samsung tends to go along with a divisive hyper-saturated look, whereas Apple’s is extra pure and balanced, each now provide you with extra management than ever earlier than, nonetheless, letting you progress the needle within the different path, on the subject of the general look of your snaps.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs iPhone 13 specs and efficiency

(*4*)Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 review kitchen closed in-hand

(Picture credit score: Future)

Samsung has geared up the Galaxy Z Flip 4 with the very quickest cell processor accessible to a producer not known as Apple: the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1.

It’s quick alright, with Geekbench 5 multi-core scores that circle the 4300 mark. That’s effectively forward of the Android competitors, although the iPhone 13 scored 4688 in the identical check.

Efficiency is at all times a problem for Samsung and each different Android producer when evaluating their merchandise with the newest iPhone. Apple’s customized processors merely are usually quicker.

To be truthful to Qualcomm, the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 truly pips the A15 Bionic in a number of GPU metrics. This can be a a lot nearer combat than we’ve seen for some time.

iPhone 13

(Picture credit score: TechRadar)

In fact, we’re deep into the A15 Bionic’s life, and it’s the A16 Bionic chip that would be the true up to date of the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1. For now, although, the 2 chips are kind of competing in the identical ballpark, actually by way of the everyday expertise you’ll be able to count on.

Elsewhere, the Galaxy Z Flip 4 has double the RAM of the iPhone 13, at 8GB vs 4GB. That’s a reasonably meaningless comparability, nonetheless, given how far more effectively iOS makes use of its sources. In terms of storage, each telephones supply 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB.

Probably the most significant variations between all Apple and Samsung units is software program. Apple’s iOS is at all times clear, quick, and fully in sync with its {hardware}, although additionally fairly locked down.

Samsung’s One UI is a weighty UI layer sitting on prime of Google’s Android 12 (at launch, no less than). It’s much less elegant than iOS, extra laden down with bloatware and sluggish animations, but additionally extra customisable. This one’s largely a matter of choice, and certainly which app and repair ecosystem you’re already invested in.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs iPhone 13 battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 review Bora Purple open acute angled 16:9

(Picture credit score: Future)

The Galaxy Z Flip 4 runs off a 3,700mAh battery, which is welcome progress (12% bigger) over the weedy 3,300mAh cell of the Flip 3.

Apple’s iPhone 13 runs on a 3,240mAh cell, which appears like a giant drawback. However keep in mind what we’ve stated already about iOS being extra environment friendly with its sources. That applies to battery utilization too.

Once we reviewed the iPhone 13, we discovered that it had a few of the most spectacular stamina we’d seen from an iPhone. We tended to finish up with 20% left within the tank on the finish of a heavy day.

iPhone 13

(Picture credit score: TechRadar)

The Flip 3 usually struggled to final an entire day and the enhancements made to the Z Flip 4’s battery capability flip it right into a extra tenable day-long cellphone, nevertheless it nonetheless lags behind the iPhone (and most different flagships of similarly-priced smartphones, for that matter).

Neither of those telephones wows relating to their charging provision. The iPhone 13 helps 23W charging, whereas the Flip 4 helps 25W charging, which is effectively wanting the 65W, 80W, and 120W opposition. Neither provides you a charging brick within the field both.

On the wi-fi entrance, the iPhone 13 helps 7.5W, or 15W speeds for those who choose up a MagSafe for iPhone charger. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 helps 15W wi-fi charging and 4.5W reverse wi-fi charging; excellent on your Bluetooth headphones or smartwatch.


These are two elegant flagship telephones, however Samsung goes to should go some to match the iPhone 13’s easy, useful excellence.

The Galaxy Z Flip 3 launched at across the similar time because the iPhone 13, and fell wanting Apple’s champ in our reckoning attributable to its middling battery life and insufficient digicam system for such a premium worth.

Has the Galaxy Z Flip 4 made up any floor previously 12 months? It is higher however nonetheless not clear-cut, not least as a result of even with its relative affordability, the Z Flip 4 remains to be one of the costly telephones in the marketplace.

In fact, these are additionally two very completely different units interesting to completely different markets, and the secure selection is that the iPhone 13 is rarely going to match the joys of the brand new that comes with Samsung’s foldable. The way you view the entire foldable idea may very well be the deciding issue right here.